Last Updated: February 2025 (Paramus, NJ)
National securities fraud lawyers at Patil Law P.C. are investigating current UBS Financial Services Inc. broker Steven Syslo (CRD #4308992) regarding allegations of unsuitable investment recommendations and misrepresentation involving energy-related securities. Multiple customer complaints have resulted in significant settlements.
Critical Insights About Paramus Financial Advisor Steven Syslo
- Advisor Name: Steven Syslo
- CRD: 4308992
- Current Employer: UBS Financial Services Inc.
- Classification: Registered Representative & Investment Adviser Representative
- Primary Location: Paramus, NJ
- Can Steven Syslo be sued in FINRA arbitration: Yes
- Customer Disputes: Three settled complaints
- Current Registrations: Licensed in 28 states
- Years of Experience: Since 2000
- Previous Employers: Morgan Stanley (2009-2016), Morgan Stanley & Co. (2008-2009)
- Professional Qualifications: Series 7, 66, SIE licenses
- Business Location: 61 South Paramus Road, Mack Center IV, Paramus, NJ 07652
- Current Status: Active with UBS Financial Services
Details Of Recent Customer Complaints
- Recent settlement of $34,203 involving allegations of misrepresentation regarding energy-related securities
- $19,000 settlement concerning unsuitable investment recommendations
- Multiple customer complaints involving mutual funds and corporate debt securities
- Pattern of allegations regarding misrepresentation and suitability issues
Analysis Of Alleged Misconduct
The pattern of complaints raises serious concerns about:
- Investment suitability practices
- Risk disclosure procedures
- Client communication methods
- Portfolio management approach
- Compliance with firm policies
- Documentation of client objectives
- Trading authorization protocols
Regulatory Framework And Investor Protection
SEC Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) requires:
- Full disclosure of investment risks
- Suitable investment recommendations
- Clear documentation of client authorization
- Accurate representation of investments
- Protection of client interests
- Proper record keeping
FINRA Rules And Their Significance
FINRA Rule 2111 mandates:
- Reasonable basis suitability
- Customer-specific suitability
- Quantitative suitability
- Proper documentation
- Clear communication
- Risk disclosure
Red Flags For Investors
- Multiple settled complaints
- Energy sector investment issues
- Suitability concerns
- Misrepresentation allegations
- Pattern of customer disputes
- Significant settlement amounts
- Corporate bond complaints
- Documentation questions
Implications For Current And Former Clients
Current and former clients should:
- Review all account statements
- Examine investment suitability
- Verify risk disclosures
- Check account documentation
- Monitor performance reports
- Document all communications
- Assess portfolio allocations
- Consider independent review
Patil Law P.C. Will Help You Recover Your Investment Losses
If you have concerns about investments made with Mr. Syslo or questions about how your accounts were handled, please contact Attorney Patil online or call (800) 950-6553 for a free initial consultation. Our securities fraud attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning we only get paid if we help you recover money.