San Diego, California – December 15, 2025 – Financial advisor Matthew David Copley (CRD# 6247665) is currently registered with Emerson Equity LLC and Copley Financial Group, Inc. in San Diego, California. According to FINRA BrokerCheck records, Copley has two pending customer complaints filed in September 2025 alleging unsuitable investment recommendations involving real estate securities, breach of fiduciary duty, and violations of securities laws. Investors who worked with Copley should review their account statements carefully and may be entitled to pursue recovery through FINRA arbitration.
BrokerCheck Snapshot
Name: Matthew David Copley
CRD #: 6247665
Firm: Emerson Equity LLC / Copley Financial Group, Inc.
Location: San Diego, California
Years in Industry: 24
Number of Disclosures: 4 (2 pending customer disputes, 1 resolved regulatory event, 1 dismissed criminal matter)
Customer Complaints Against Matthew Copley
Complaint #1 – Filed September 16, 2025
A customer filed an arbitration claim with FINRA on September 16, 2025 against Matthew Copley while he was registered with Emerson Equity LLC. The complaint alleges wrongful conduct, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of written contract, misrepresentation and omission, violation of state and federal securities laws, FINRA rules of fair practice, and Kansas Law.
The dispute involves real estate securities. The claimant is requesting general and compensatory damages in an amount according to proof, but not less than $688,536.32, plus lost opportunity costs, rescission of the unsuitable investments respondents recommended, cost of proceedings, punitive damages, interest at the legal rate on all sums recovered, attorney’s fees and costs, and such other relief as the panel deems just and appropriate.
Status: Pending
FINRA Case Number: 25-01936
Product Type: Real Estate Security
Complaint #2 – Filed September 17, 2025
A second customer filed an arbitration claim with FINRA on September 17, 2025, also involving Matthew Copley’s activities at Emerson Equity LLC. This complaint alleges breach of contract and warranties, promissory estoppel, consumer protection and deceptive trade practices act violations, violation of securities statutes, breach of fiduciary duty, claims under common law, vicarious liability, and violation of Regulation Best Interest.
The complaint involves real estate securities and seeks an award between $100,000 and $500,000 including all direct and/or consequential damages and statutory and/or punitive damages, plus interest and costs, including attorneys’ fees. The claimant reserves the right to amend the amount at any time, including during hearings. The claim also seeks all sums lost in any account on all transactions made or not made, plus lost opportunities, rescission of any or all transactions, statutory damages, punitive damages, pre-award and pre-judgment interest, all costs of proceedings, and any other relief available to the claimant.
Status: Pending
FINRA Case Number: 25-01950
Product Type: Real Estate Security
Pattern of Complaints and Risk Factors
While each case is unique, complaints alleging unsuitable investment recommendations, breach of fiduciary duty, and misrepresentation may indicate concerns related to inadequate risk disclosures, failure to conduct proper due diligence on investment products, or recommendations that were inconsistent with a client’s investment objectives and risk tolerance. Real estate securities, including non-traded REITs and private placements, often carry significant liquidity risks and may not be appropriate for all investors. Investors should carefully review account statements and seek legal guidance if similar issues occurred.
Can Investors Recover Losses?
Investors who were recommended unsuitable or high-risk investments may be entitled to recover losses through FINRA arbitration. Patil Law, P.C. has over 15 years of experience representing investors in FINRA arbitration and securities litigation, with more than $25 million recovered for clients across 1,000+ cases. We provide a free, confidential consultation to review your potential claim. Our firm works on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney fees unless we successfully recover money for you.
If you invested in real estate securities or other alternative investments recommended by Matthew Copley and experienced losses, you may have grounds for a claim based on unsuitable recommendations, breach of fiduciary duty, or investment fraud.
About FINRA Arbitration
FINRA arbitration is a streamlined dispute resolution process for securities-related claims. It offers a faster, more cost-effective alternative to traditional court litigation. Most cases are resolved within 12-16 months. Claims generally must be filed within six years of the incident. The arbitration process is designed to provide investors with an accessible forum to resolve disputes with brokers and brokerage firms.
Related Brokers and Firms
Investors who experienced losses with Matthew Copley or other representatives at Emerson Equity LLC should review their account statements and investment recommendations carefully. Our firm handles cases involving various types of broker misconduct, including:
- Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
- REIT Losses
- Failure to Supervise
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the complaint against Matthew Copley?
Matthew Copley faces two pending customer complaints filed in September 2025 alleging unsuitable investment recommendations involving real estate securities, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentation, and violations of securities laws and FINRA rules. The complaints seek damages totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars. These are pending allegations that have not been proven or adjudicated.
Can investors recover losses involving Emerson Equity LLC?
Yes, investors who suffered losses due to unsuitable recommendations or broker misconduct at Emerson Equity LLC may be entitled to recover their losses through FINRA arbitration. Investors have rights under federal securities laws and FINRA rules, and may pursue claims for unsuitable investments, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentation, and other forms of misconduct.
What is FINRA arbitration?
FINRA arbitration is a forum for resolving disputes between investors and brokers or brokerage firms. It is typically faster and less expensive than traditional court litigation. An arbitration panel reviews evidence, hears testimony, and makes a binding decision. Most securities disputes are resolved through this process rather than in court. The arbitration process generally takes 12-16 months from filing to resolution.
What does “unsuitable investment” mean?
An unsuitable investment is one that does not align with an investor’s financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, or investment time horizon. Brokers have a duty to conduct due diligence and recommend only investments that are suitable for their clients based on the client’s individual circumstances. Recommending high-risk or illiquid investments to conservative investors or those nearing retirement may constitute unsuitable recommendations.
How do I look up a broker on BrokerCheck?
To look up a broker on FINRA BrokerCheck, visit www.brokercheck.finra.org and enter the broker’s name or CRD number. The report will show the broker’s employment history, professional qualifications, and any disclosure events, including customer complaints, regulatory actions, and criminal matters. BrokerCheck is a free public resource provided by FINRA to help investors research brokers and brokerage firms.
What should I do if I suspect broker misconduct?
If you suspect broker misconduct, first gather and review all account statements, trade confirmations, and communications with your broker. Document any concerns, including unsuitable recommendations, unauthorized trades, excessive fees, or misrepresentations. Consider consulting with a securities attorney who can evaluate your potential claim. Do not delay, as securities claims are subject to time limitations, typically six years from the date of the transaction or discovery of the fraud.
About Patil Law, P.C.
Patil Law, P.C. is a securities litigation firm dedicated to representing investors who have suffered losses due to broker misconduct, unsuitable recommendations, and securities fraud. Founded in 2018 by attorney Chetan Patil, the firm focuses exclusively on FINRA arbitration and investment loss recovery.
With over 15 years of combined experience in securities law, Patil Law has successfully recovered more than $25 million for clients across 1,000+ cases. Attorney Chetan Patil earned his law degree from Case Western Reserve University School of Law. Attorneys Gabriela Dubrocq and Patricia Herrera earned their law degrees from University of Miami. The firm handles cases nationwide involving unauthorized trading, churning, unsuitable investments, breach of fiduciary duty, and failure to supervise.
Patil Law works on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients pay no attorney fees unless the firm successfully recovers money on their behalf. All consultations are free and confidential.
Contact Patil Law for a Free Consultation
If you invested with Matthew Copley and experienced losses, contact Patil Law, P.C. for a free, confidential consultation. We will review your investment history, account statements, and potential claims at no cost to you. Our experienced securities attorneys can help you understand your rights and options for recovering your losses.
Call: 800-950-6553
Email: info@patillaw.com
No obligation. No attorney fees unless we recover money for you.
The information in this post is based on FINRA BrokerCheck records and public filings. Allegations described are pending or unproven and may be contested. All investors are entitled to fair treatment under securities laws. This is attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This communication is for informational purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship.
