Ready to Talk?
Please reach out to our team so we can privately discuss your situation. We’ll review the facts of your matter and discuss how we can help you. We pride ourselves on always being compassionate and respectful.
Understanding Material Omissions in Investment Fraud Cases
When investors make financial decisions, they rely on complete and accurate information. Unfortunately, many securities fraud cases involve not what was said, but what was deliberately left unsaid. At our firm, our investment fraud attorneys have extensive experience representing clients harmed by material omissions in securities transactions. These cases require specialized legal knowledge and strategic approaches that our securities fraud lawyers implement effectively.
Legal Definition of Material Omissions
A material omission occurs when a broker, financial advisor, or issuer fails to disclose information that would likely influence an investor’s decision-making process. Under federal securities laws, particularly Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, parties have an affirmative duty to disclose material facts in connection with the purchase or sale of securities.
Our investment fraud lawyer team regularly handles cases where critical information was withheld, including:
- Undisclosed risks associated with investment products
- Hidden fees and compensation arrangements
- Conflicts of interest affecting investment recommendations
- Prior regulatory actions or disciplinary history
- Financial conditions affecting investment viability
The “Materiality” Standard in Securities Law
For an omission to be legally actionable, it must be deemed “material.” Our securities fraud attorneys apply the established Supreme Court standard that information is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision.
In representing clients, our investment fraud lawyers must demonstrate that:
- The omitted information would have significantly altered the “total mix” of information available
- The party had a duty to disclose the information
- The omission was made with the requisite level of intent (scienter)
- The investor suffered financial harm as a direct result
Establishing Duty to Disclose
Not all omissions constitute fraud. Our fraud attorney specialists focus on establishing that the party had a legal obligation to disclose the withheld information. This duty typically arises from:
- Fiduciary relationships between advisors and clients
- Regulatory disclosure requirements for securities issuers
- Previous statements that require completion or clarification
- Special knowledge possessed only by one party to the transaction
Preston L. (attorney)
Joan P. (attorney)
The Role of Intent in Material Omission Cases
Successfully prosecuting material omission claims requires proving scienter—intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud. Our investment fraud attorneys have developed sophisticated strategies for establishing this critical element through:
- Pattern evidence of selective disclosure practices
- Internal communications contradicting public statements
- Evidence of financial motives for concealing information
- Timing of transactions relative to undisclosed information
Regulatory Framework Governing Material Omissions
Our securities fraud lawyers leverage multiple legal frameworks when pursuing material omission cases:
SEC Rule 10b-5
The cornerstone anti-fraud provision prohibiting any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud in connection with securities transactions.
Securities Act of 1933
Requires full and fair disclosure in securities registration statements and prohibits misstatements or omissions in offering documents.
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
Establishes fiduciary obligations for investment advisors, including comprehensive disclosure requirements.
State Securities Laws (“Blue Sky Laws”)
Provide additional protections and remedies for investors victimized by material omissions.
Proving Damages from Material Omissions
Establishing financial harm caused specifically by undisclosed information presents unique challenges. Our investment fraud attorney team works with financial experts to quantify damages through:
- Loss causation analysis connecting omissions to investment depreciation
- “Benefit of the bargain” calculations showing difference between represented and actual value
- Opportunity cost assessments for alternative investments that would have been selected with full disclosure
- Market-adjusted loss calculations accounting for external economic factors
Recent Legal Developments in Material Omission Standards
Securities law continues to evolve regarding material omissions. Our fraud lawyer practice stays at the forefront of legal developments, including:
- Judicial interpretations narrowing or expanding disclosure obligations
- Regulatory initiatives enhancing transparency requirements
- Industry-specific disclosure standards for complex financial products
- Digital disclosure requirements for online investment platforms
Case Study: Successful Material Omission Recovery
Our investment fraud lawyers secured a $3.2 million settlement for investors when a financial advisor failed to disclose significant conflicts of interest affecting recommendations. The advisor had received substantial incentives for promoting specific investment products while presenting advice as objective and tailored to client needs.
Through meticulous investigation, our securities fraud attorneys uncovered internal communications demonstrating the advisor’s knowledge of these conflicts and deliberate decision to withhold this information from clients. The case exemplifies how material omissions often involve sophisticated schemes requiring specialized legal expertise.
How Our Investment Fraud Attorneys Approach Material Omission Cases
When handling cases involving omitted information, our securities fraud lawyer team implements a comprehensive approach:
- Thorough Documentation Review: Examining all investment materials, communications, and disclosures for what was—and wasn’t—revealed
- Regulatory Research: Identifying specific disclosure obligations applicable to the investment context
- Industry Standard Analysis: Establishing customary disclosure practices within the relevant financial sector
- Strategic Expert Consultation: Working with industry specialists who can testify to the significance of the omitted information
- Comprehensive Discovery: Pursuing internal communications and documents that may reveal knowledge of undisclosed facts
Contact Our Securities Fraud Attorneys for Material Omission Cases
If you believe your investment losses resulted from information that was deliberately withheld from you, our investment fraud lawyer team can help. Material omission cases require specialized legal knowledge and strategic approaches that our fraud attorney specialists implement effectively.
Contact our experienced securities fraud attorneys today for a confidential consultation. Our investment fraud lawyer team will evaluate your situation and develop a targeted strategy for pursuing maximum recovery.