Search close icon

Last Updated: November 2024 (Fort Collins, Colorado)

National securities fraud lawyers at Patil Law P.C. are investigating investment advisor Adam Brunin (CRD #4407663), founder and President of Navigation Wealth Management, Inc., who faces multiple pending customer disputes involving allegations of excessive equity concentration and undisclosed fees in variable annuity transactions. The complaints raise serious concerns about risk management and disclosure practices.

Adam Edward Brunin (CRD #4407663) currently operates Navigation Wealth Management, Inc. in Fort Collins, Colorado. His record shows multiple current customer disputes with total alleged damages exceeding $220,000. Below, we provide further details about his professional history, negative disclosures, and customer complaints, which investors should consider before working with him.

Critical Insights About Fort Collins, CO Investment Advisor Adam Brunin

  • Advisor Name: Adam Edward Brunin
  • CRD: 4407663
  • Location: Fort Collins, CO
  • Current Firm: Navigation Wealth Management, Inc.
  • Classification: Investment Advisor Representative
  • Primary Location: Fort Collins, CO
  • Can Adam Brunin be sued in private arbitration: Yes
  • Has Mr. Brunin been sanctioned by regulators: No
  • Recent Disputes: Two pending customer complaints totaling over $220,000 in alleged damages

If you have suffered investment losses in an account handled by Mr. Brunin or have a question about the performance of your account, please contact Attorney Patil online or (800) 950-6553 for a free initial consultation.

Recent Investment Loss Claims Against Adam Brunin

Current Pending Complaints

1. October 2024 Equity Concentration Complaint:

  • Allegations: Over-concentration in equities and inappropriate market timing
  • Investment Type: Listed equity securities
  • Alleged Damages: $210,000
  • Client Profile: Conservative investment objectives
  • Status: Pending resolution

2. June 2022 Variable Annuity Complaint:

  • Allegations: Undisclosed premium tax fees on $500,000 investment
  • Product: Nationwide Variable Annuity
  • Transaction Details: Full surrender resulting in $564,985.77 account value
  • Alleged Damages: $10,000
  • Status: Pending resolution

Detailed Analysis of Allegations Against Adam Brunin

Portfolio Concentration Issues

The recent allegations regarding excessive equity concentration raise significant concerns under multiple regulatory requirements. Brunin’s alleged actions may violate fundamental principles of portfolio management and risk distribution, specifically:

  • Failure to maintain appropriate asset allocation based on client risk tolerance
  • Implementation of unsuitable market timing strategies
  • Disregard for stated conservative investment objectives
  • Inadequate portfolio diversification practices

Fee Disclosure Problems

The variable annuity complaint highlights potential violations of transparency and disclosure requirements, including:

  • Failure to fully disclose premium tax fees
  • Inadequate explanation of surrender charges
  • Possible omissions regarding cost structure
  • Questions about the suitability of the annuity recommendation

Regulatory Framework and Investor Protection

Understanding the regulatory framework helps illustrate the serious nature of these allegations against Brunin.

SEC Regulation Best Interest

The SEC’s Regulation Best Interest imposes a heightened standard of conduct for investment professionals when dealing with retail customers. This regulation, which became effective in 2020, requires investment advisors to put their clients’ interests ahead of their own financial gains. For cases like Brunin’s, this means thoroughly evaluating and documenting the suitability of equity concentrations and ensuring complete transparency about all fees and charges associated with variable annuity products. The regulation mandates clear disclosure of all material facts and requires advisors to identify and address any conflicts of interest that might influence their recommendations.

FINRA Rules and Their Significance

FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability) requires investment advisors to have a reasonable basis for believing that their recommendations are suitable for clients based on their financial situation and needs. In Brunin’s case, the allegations of excessive equity concentration in conservative portfolios directly challenge compliance with this fundamental rule. The rule requires a three-part suitability analysis: reasonable-basis suitability, customer-specific suitability, and quantitative suitability.

FINRA Rule 2330 (Members’ Responsibilities Regarding Deferred Variable Annuities) specifically governs the sale of variable annuity products. This rule requires thorough analysis and documentation of the suitability of variable annuity recommendations, including detailed examination of fees, surrender charges, and tax implications. The rule was designed to address concerns about the complexity of these products and ensure that investors fully understand their features and costs.

FINRA Rule 2210 (Communications with the Public) establishes standards for all communications with investors, including requirements for fair and balanced presentation of risks and benefits. This rule is particularly relevant to the allegations of inadequate fee disclosure in Brunin’s variable annuity transactions.

FINRA Rule 3110 (Supervision) requires firms to establish and maintain a system to supervise the activities of each associated person that is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations. This includes monitoring portfolio concentrations and reviewing variable annuity transactions for suitability and proper disclosure.

Investment Advisor Experience and Background

Adam Brunin’s career in financial services spans over two decades:

  • Navigation Wealth Management, Inc. (2016-Present) – President and Investment Advisor Representative
  • Sigma Financial Corporation (2005-2016)
  • NYLIFE Securities Inc. (2001-2005)

Professional Qualifications:

  • Series 65 (Uniform Investment Adviser Law Examination)
  • Series 63 (Uniform Securities Agent State Law Examination)
  • Series 6 (Investment Company Products/Variable Contracts Representative Examination)
  • Securities Industry Essentials Examination

Red Flags for Investors

Several concerning patterns emerge from Brunin’s regulatory record:

  1. The significant size of the equity concentration complaint ($210,000) suggests potential systematic issues with risk management practices.
  2. The variable annuity complaint highlights possible problems with disclosure practices and transparency.
  3. Both pending complaints involve complex investment vehicles requiring detailed client understanding and careful risk assessment.
  4. The timing of complaints suggests recent issues with investment strategy implementation and disclosure practices.

Patil Law P.C. Will Help You Recover Your Investment Losses

If you have suffered investment losses in an account handled by Adam Brunin or have questions about the performance of your account, please contact Attorney Patil online or (800) 950-6553 for a free initial consultation.

Our cases are handled on a contingency basis. We don’t get paid unless we win for you.

Author Photo

Chetan Patil

Chetan Patil is the founder and Managing Partner of the Patil Law. He brings over 15 years of extensive experience in diverse complex disputes and transactions, across the country. Mr. Patil specializes in litigations, trials, arbitrations, and appeals of complex securities, FINRA, financial and business disputes, with an emphasis in securities, financial services, and financial regulatory law.
Navigation

    Related Posts

    Advisor Alert: Our Attorneys Are Investigating Adam Brunin For Investment Fraud

    Continue Reading